Sunday, November 18, 2012

Movie List 2012: September

* = rewatched


September


93.*
Labyrinth

A young girl's baby brother is kidnapped by the Goblin King. Now she must navigate her way through a labyrinth in order to rescue him.

Genre: 80's lovechild of David Bowie and Jim Henson.


You know what? I never noticed this movie's prominent featuring of David Bowie's package until a few years ago when this video pointed it out. Now that it's been pointed out to me, however, I can't help but notice. And now that I've mentioned it to you, you won't be able to either.

Good luck with that.

Anyways, I have some mixed feelings about this movie. It doesn't work on most of the levels I'm usually looking for in stories. The characters are all rather cut-and-dry, the plot is extremely simple, and you know what, I'm just gonna say it: the songs are weird—not bad, mind you, just really bizarrely inserted into scenes.

And by all rights I shouldn't like it. But dammit if Jim Henson wasn't one superbly creative genius. The plot only has 4 beats (Kidnapped, Labyrinth Tasks, Rescue Scene, Happily Ever After), and the Tasks one dominates the vast majority. Yet somehow Henson creates such imaginative and memorable visuals that the plot of "Overcome puzzles" becomes interesting to watch.

I might knock it around a bit, but it is a classic. And like any true classic you just can't quite put my finger on what it is that makes it that way. It really is memorable and quite fun and if you haven't seen it I think it's definitely worth a watch.




94.
Batman Mask of the Phantasm

A masked killer is murdering members of crime syndicates, but will Batman let an old flame distract him from solving the case?

Genre: Animated TV show brought to big screen


I've always heard such good things about this movie and yet had never gotten around to watching it. But recently I was reading a bunch of Batman comics and finally found myself in the mood to see what it was all about. And you know what?

HIGHLY OVERRATED.

My goodness, I predicted the identity of the Phantasm so fast it wasn't even funny. I really don't get what the fuss over this movie is. It's basically just an extended episode of Batman: The Animated Series. Now, Batman: The Animated Series was a brilliant show, but it was a television show and this is a movie. Correction: This is a movie done in the exact style of a television show.

I think I need a comparison. Let's use Cowboy Bebop. Cowboy Bebop was an amazing cartoon and it had a movie made after the series was done. While the movie has all the elements you loved from the show, it was a Movie. The animation was nicer than ever, the plot was bigger and the stakes were higher than normal. It really made use of the format. Batman, however, had normal TV cartoon animation, the plot was no different than a normal episode of the show, and the stakes were also no different than a typical episode. It doesn't make use of the format and if you weren't told you'd probably think it was a two-part episode of the show.

If you like the show, you'll like the movie. It isn't bad and it isn't great, but it just doesn't have the scale a full-length-released-in-theaters movie should have. There were some interesting elements wherein Batman struggles with whether or not he should continue along the path he's created, but I felt they weren't brought to fruition.

In the end this just reminds me of a watered down version of the great graphic novel Batman: The Long Halloween.




95.
Robot & Frank

Set in the near future an ex-burglar named Frank is suffering from senility is given a personal care robot to look after him. At first the Luddite Frank hates the idea, until he learns that perhaps it is the perfect tool for an old thief.

Genre: Alzheimer sci-fi buddy comedy.

This is such an unusual movie.

What's more is that it's unusual for a number of reasons. The story it's telling is much smaller than most movies you see. Not to mention  that the extremely-near-future setting is one you don't see too often; most people preferring the deep future or the present. And the fact that it's a buddy comedy that deals with a serious topic like Alzheimer's through a sci-fi heist set-up. I mean...where did this thing come from?

I'm not knocking it or anything, in fact I really enjoyed it, but I want to compare it to something and I'm a bit at a loss here. So if you're in the mood to see something really unique that's both amusing and touching, I'd highly recommend you check out this one. It's funny, it's touching, and it's quite unlike anything else.





95.
Sleepwalk With Me

A struggling comedian's relationship stress begins manifesting itself through vivid and increasingly dangerous bouts of sleep walking.

Genre: Indie comedy

If you're familiar with the This American Life regular Mike Birbigula then you've probably already heard this story. And it's a pretty great story. One that deserves to have been told in so many mediums. In fact one of the things I love so much about this movie is that it has a voice all it's own. You can tell this was a product of love produced independently from the big studios, because a big studio would never have been able to tell a story like this properly. It was a blessing in disguise that Mike Birbigula starred and directed this movie, because it's his story to tell.

I've gotta say this was one of my favorite movies I've seen this year. It's weird and it's funny. I love all of the characters even when they're making bad decisions. It's fun, quirky, and when you're done watching it you continue to think about it because you'll have found that it really had something it say.


96.
De Vrais Mesonges

The owner of beauty salon receives a love letter. She then sends the letter to her depressed mother in order to make her feel better about herself. However, soon everything becomes rather complicated.

Genre: French...comedy?

So I stumbled across this one while working at the library. I saw it starred Audrey Tatou and the cover featured reviews saying that it was just like Amelie. And since Amelie is my favorite movie ever, I figured this one was worth a look.

But it wasn't.

It most definitely wasn't.

It's so bad. There isn't a single character who you don't start to hate by the end. Generally I love the whole mixed-up love polygon set-up, but here it's just creepy. They make it so, so very creepy. All the characters are petty assholes who seem to lack any real empathy.

I don't even want to talk about it anymore. Just trust me: It's awful. Don't watch it.




97.
From Dusk Till Dawn

A pair of fugitive brothers take a family hostage as they try to escape the US and get into Mexico. However, things take a turn for the worse when they stop to make a rendezvous at a trucker's bar that turns out to be a vampire feeding ground.

Genre: Over-the-top Action-Horror

You know, if ever there was a movie that was just an excuse for the crew to have fun, this is it. At first it's the story about these fugitive brothers, and then it takes up a different kind of angle with the kidnapping, and then suddenly there's vampires and things just get wild. It's kind of like the writer started out and along the way kept drinking and getting high; and so it just keeps getting exponentially wilder. As a movie I think it's a bit of a failure. The characters are all one-dimensional and the story is too mercurial to create anything even remotely meaningful. However, if you're having a drink and are in the mood for a piece of over-the-top ridiculous fun, then I'd highly recommend it.




98.
Looper

A crime syndicate uses time travel as way to get rid of the people they want to kill. They send the victims back in time where an assassin called a Looper is waiting to kill them and dispose of the bodies. The Loopers get paid well, but as part of their contract they know that eventually they'll have to kill their future self. However, one Looper's future self gets away and starts trying to track down the head of the syndicate as a child and change the future, while his past self is out to stop him.

Genre: Time-Travel Action


I would describe this movie as being a combination of Primer and Akira. I doubt most people will be familiar with both of those, but if you are then there you go.

It definitely wasn't what I was expecting. They play around a lot more with the possible repercussions of time-travel then I originally expected.

I had a great time with this one. My one big complaint is that they alter Joseph Gordon-Levitt's face to have him resemble Bruce Willis and for the life of me I couldn't stop thinking about it. It just looked so unnatural and I could never look at the character without thinking about the alterations. I guess I can see why they did it, but I'm pretty sure a lot more people spent this movie paying attention to the alterations, then would've paid attention to the fact that Levitt doesn't quite look like Willis. I mean, there is such a thing as the suspension of disbelief. If you tell me that they're the same guy at different periods in his life I'm willing to roll with it.

It's got an interesting set-up, the acting is all very good, the action is all very good, and it is all a lot of fun. If you like science fiction and action then you'll have a blast watching it.



99.*
Mystery Team

A group of former boy detectives, clinging to the former glory of their youth, try to solve a real case in order to prove themselves.

Genre: Quirky—and moderately raunchy—comedy


Have you ever seen the tv show Community? Well, Donald Glover (the actor who plays Troy) is the star of the film as well as one of the writers. So maybe that'll give you a little sense of what the movie is like.

It's a strange little film. It's really kind of bizarre, but that also seems to make it all the funnier. It isn't perfect. For instance I feel that the make these former boy detectives too ridiculous, to the point that you start to think that they must really have some sort of mental handicap...which just makes things really creepy.

But in the end, it's another indie comedy, and the thing I love about indie movies is that they're unique. It's not another cookie-cutter Hollywood movie. It goes places and does things you won't see in most comedies and I really enjoy it because of that. The acting is really good, the plot is really goofy and fun, and as you can imagine from a comedy there's plenty of hilarious jokes. So yeah, not perfect, but far better, far more endearing, and far more memorable than your usual comedy fare.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Book List 2012: Part 14


* = reread
[GN] = Graphic Novel or Comic Anthology
[CB] = Children's Book




151.*[GN]
Barefoot Gen, vol 1,2,3
by Keiji Nakazawa

A partially auto-biographical story about Japan during WWII and what life was like in Hiroshima before, during, and after the atomic bomb was dropped.


Is it just me or was school woefully silent about Japan during WWII? I mean, in America is seems that Japan represents the bookends to our WWII history and nothing more: the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the catalyst for the United States to enter the war, and the U.S. dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was the end.

East Asian Studies major here, I know I'm biased, but guess what? Japan was kind of a big player in WWII (and by “kind of” I mean it was one of the 3 Axis members), and it's ridiculous how underplayed their role in the war is in American schools.

I'm getting a little off topic here, but trust me that I'm getting to a point. You see, I would argue that Barefoot Gen is the best graphic novel about WWII. People love to hold up Art Speigalman's Maus as the pinnacle of comic achievement in that field, but you know what? I find Maus to be incredibly boring. Honestly, pick up a copy of Maus and look at pictures and pretend there are no words. Not only does Barefoot Gen have much more dynamic (if perhaps not as clean) artwork, but it's subject matter is more fascinating (and much rarer). No offense to Maus, but there are a million different stories across all different mediums that tell a story of the Holocaust and many of them do so in a much more moving & informative way. Yet, I have yet to come across anything that matches the visceral feeling I get from reading Barefoot Gen. Scenes from that comic are burned into my brain. I can never look at atomic bombs the same again.

Although, speaking of which, I should warn you that you should be careful with this book if you're overly squeamish...because daaaaaammn. Despite the fact that it might horrify you into a coma, I think even the squeamish ones should read it. Because trust me, you don't know shit about the horrors of the atomic bomb until you've read stuff like this. I mean, what kind of devastation do you think of when you think of the atomic bomb? My guess is a combination of Instant incineration, Radiation poisoning, and those shadows burned into walls. Scary stuff to be sure, but trust me when I say the other stuff that went down will quickly replace your old top 3. I don't want to gross anyone out by mentioning examples, but...yeah...it's terrifying. It was so freaky it reached a point where I could only start laughing, which is generally a sign of your body and brain not having a clue how to handle things.

And that's why you should read it. Even if you don't want to, because you don't want to be grossed out. Because it's important. It's important to know just how bad nuclear threats are. It's important to have horrifying, sickening images come to mind every time someone says we should nuke another country. We should all think about Gen and his family and their struggles and realize that we aren't playing a game here.


Now don't get me wrong, Gen isn't perfect. The main problem being that a fair number of scenes (especially in the first volume) lay on the messages pretty thick [extremely thick actually]. But I'm willing to overlook that, because even while it's laying down some heavy-handed-hind-sight-anti-war message, you're still getting a look at what life was like for a lot of Japanese. So many WWII stories love to demonize the axis members, but Gen does a superb job of showing a variety of viewpoints among the citizens on Japan.

And while the parts about life in Japan just before the bomb was dropped are great, it's after the bomb hits that the story really finds its stride. There are actually 6 volumes in the series, but this time around I just read the first 3. While the whole series is good, if you don't want to devote that much time I'd say at least read the 1st one, the 2nd one if you can, keep going to number 3 if you want to stop reading on a happier note, and if you get to 4 then you've obviously got the gumption and you might as well just read the entire thing...because it's great.



“
Like a wind from hell, the atomic cloud roared up 6 miles into the sky over Hiroshima..

“..Uh-h-h...

What happened? It's pitch dark!...night already?

How could that be I was on my way to school...something flashed...and after that I don't remember a thing...

Wow, what's with this wall?

*GASP*

It's...it's the lady I was just talking to--what's happened to her skin?”
”
pg 252-253





152.
The Enchanted Places
by. Christopher Milne

The autobiography of the son of Winnie the Pooh writer A.A. Milne, although you might remember him better by another name: Christopher Robin Milne.


At the end of Brainiac [BL 2012 #122], Ken Jennings mentioned something about how Christopher Robin Milne deeply resented Winnie the Pooh, as well as his dad for creating it, because he got picked on a lot for it. This struck me as incredibly sad and also possibly overblown, so I decided to go check a primary source.

It turns out Christopher Milne doesn't hate his dad or Winnie the Pooh. He admits that there were times when he was younger that he resented his dad and his works for the unwelcome attention it caused him during school and in the military, but I think it'd be fair to say that everyone resents their parents when they're younger. But he shows in the book that he really did love both his Dad and Pooh. There may have been some hardship because of the books, but I think Jennings and others have latched onto a small part of a larger story and phrased things inappropriately.

Anyways, I quite enjoyed this one. I usually don't go in for biographical stories, but Milne knows what he's doing. he doesn't try to expound on every moment of his life. He chooses a handful of ideas, memories, and events that are representative of the whole. And it makes the book really fun.

Plus if you're a big Winnie the Pooh fan, you get all sorts of interesting information about all sorts of behind-the-scenes happenings.



“ 
In the last chapter of The House at Pooh Corner our ways part. I go on to become a school boy. A child and his bear remain playing in the enchanted spot at the top of the forest. The toys are left behind, no longer wanted, in the nursery. So a glass case was made for them and it was fastened to the nursery wall in Mallord Street, and they climbed inside. And there they lived, sometimes glanced at, mostly forgotten, until the war came. Roo was missing. He had been lost years before, in the apple orchard up the lane. And Piglet's face was a funny shape where a dog had bitten him. During the war they went to America and there they have been ever since...

If you saw them today, your immediate reaction would be: “How old and battered and lifeless they look.” But of course they are old and battered and lifeless. They are only toys and you are making them for the real animals who lived in the forest. Even in their prime they were no more than a first rough sketch, the merest hint of what they were to become, and they are now long past their prime. Eeyore is the most recognizable; Piglet the least. So, if I am asked “Aren't you sad that the animals are not in their glass case with you today?” I must answer “Not really,” and hope that this doesn't seem too unkind. I like to have around me the things I like today, not the things I once liked many years ago. I don't want a house to be a museum. When I grew out of my old First Eleven blazer, it was thrown away, not lovingly preserved to remind me of the proud day I won it with a score of 13 not out. Every child has his Pooh, but one would think it odd if every man still kept his Pooh to remind him of his childhood. But my Pooh is different, you say: he is the Pooh. No, this only makes him different to you, not different to me. My toys were and are to me no more than yours were and are to you. I do not love them more because they are known to children in Australia or Japan. Fame has nothing to do with love.

I wouldn't like a glass case that said: “Here is fame”; and I don't need a glass case to remind me: “Here was love.”
”
-pg 78-79





153.
Yellowrocket
by. Todd Bass

A collection of poems.


You know what? Todd Bass is officially one of my Top 5 Favorite Poets. And in case you're curious here is a list of my Top 5 Favorite Poets: Edgar Allen Poe, Shel Silverstein, Clive Barker, Sherman Alexie, and Todd Bass.

But yeah, it's poetry, so I don't see the point in analyzing it for review. Poetry relies too much on your specific tastes. Just know that I love his stuff. I'd say that overall Pitch was the superior collection, but this one's still great.



“
 Not Crash, Nor Roar

but the chug of train is how survivors
tend to explain the score of an oncoming twister. Queer,

to compare a work of nature to so
tame a thing as steel wheels riding on parallel rails,

but isn't that how terror assails us: by masquerading
its powers as everyday things, spinning clouds

into funnels, towers into tunnels?
And do we ascertain the sound as locomotive

while the tornado's rough tongue touches down,
or do we apply the metaphoric construction

only after the destruction blows town?
And if that latter, doesn't the sound describe

not terror's arrival, but safety's departure,
as it rumbles over the switches of our survival?

Does it ever get easier for us, the lovelorn,
hugging ourselves against the strain

of being left behind,
on a platform,

in the rain? 

”
-pg 38

[P.S. I wasn't able to replicate it, but in the book the lines are spaced so that they poem as a whole creates the image of a tornado...and that's awesome.]





154.
I Shall Wear Midnight
by. Terry Pratchett

The fourth, and final book, in the Tiffany Aching series, in which Tiffany must confront the ultimate foe of witches.


You know what? I thought The Wintersmith was the last book of this series, and in that review I expressed my wish that there'd be another one. And no one mentioned the fact that there indeed IS another book! I know for a fact that at least one of you folks knew this and yet failed to mention it. Basically what I'm getting at here is that you're all terrible people.

But enough of that. I love the Tiffany Aching books. And yet my feelings towards this one is a bit mixed. On one hand I felt that it was probably the weakest one of the series, but at the same time I think it provides a wonderful end note to the series. So...yeah...it's hard to coalesce disparate ideas like those.

My problems basically amount to the fact that the beginning of the book sets a tone of danger and excitement that is extremely high and yet it wasn't able to maintain that level throughout the book. The villain is said to be some extraordinary force of evil, and yet it really doesn't seem anything more than a slight inconvenience most of the time.

Like usual, I feel the need to say that me complaining about things in my favorite series comes from a place of extremely high expectations. It's by no means bad, I was just hoping for more than it was prepared to offer. I would recommend not going into this one expecting some epic showdown of Good vs. Evil. Go in expecting a fun story where the loose ends of the series are tied up, leading to an artful end to the series.



“
Oh, yes—she could imagine the conversation in the pub, with the beer joining in and people remembering where all those things that weren't weapons were hanging in their sheds. Every man was the kind in his little castle. Everyone knew that—well, at least every man—and so you minded your own business when it came to another man's castle until the castle begin to stink, and then you had to do something about it lest all castles should fall. Mr. Petty was one of the neighborhood's sullen little secrets, but he was not a secret anymore.

“I am your only chance, Mr. Petty,” she said. “Run away. Grab what you can and run away right now. Run away to where they've never heard of you, and then run a bit further, just to be on the safe side, because I will not be able to stop them, do you understand? Personally, I could not care less what happens to your miserable frame, but I do not wish to see good people get turned into bad people by doing a murder, so you just leg it across the fields and I won't remember which way you went.”

“You can't turn me out of my own house,” he mumbled, finding some drunken defiance.

“You've lost your house, your wife, your daughter...and your grandson, Mr. Petty. You will find no friends here this night. I am just offering you your life.”
”
-Pg 22-23





155.
Until They Bring the Streetcars Back
by. Stanley Gordon West

A story set in 1960's St. Paul, Minnesota, about a high school boy who meets a strange girl.


I realize that summary sounds really open and vague. It is like that because it is a quality summary.


I read this one because it was recommended by one of the student workers at the library.

It really wasn't my sort of thing.

The main character is a doofus and the "mystery” behind the strange girl is pretty ridiculous. And by "pretty ridiculous” I mean "utterly ridiculous.” It was so bizarre that I actually started seriously believing that there was going to be a twist wherein we learn that the girl is just messing with him. Sadly that wasn't the case and the whole thing was serious. Did I already mention that the main character is a doofus?

That all being said there were some memorable moments and the fact that it was set in 1960's St. Paul was the pretty darn interesting. I had heard mention of the old streetcars, but never really heard much about their history. It really is a shame that they were all torn up, considering that now we're spending so much money to put lightrail lines back in.

On a lighter note, there was a part of this book that I totally misread. I wasn't reading very closely because the main character was being a doofus. But in my defence, when a teenage boy is said to run off into an alley to "release the zeppelin" after having ridden in a car with a cute girl riding on his lap, I really don't think I can be blamed for my confusion. Turns out he was talking about a fart...I think that is an accurate summary of how doofusy this character was.

In conclusion: this book has potential, a setting I found intriguing, awful doofy characters, a friggin' ridiculous plot line, and reads like it was commissioned by a school to try to make learning about the history of St. Paul kind of "cool."



“
Peggy was real sad so I promised she could be with me when I let Hot-Foot go. I figured he'd have a better chance if I let him go at night, so just before bedtime, I got Peggy and we tiptoed down the back stairway. When she opened the outside door ahead of me she called into the dark alley.

“We've called the police! The Police are on their way, we've called the police!”

“What are you doing?” I asked her.

“Scaring away anyone who's lurking in the alley to rob or hurt you.”

I laughed as we crossed the alley.

“There's no one lurking out here to hurt you or anything.”

“You never know,” she said and she followed me closely down the alley.

“Do you always yell that?” I asked.

“Always, every time I come out here in the dark.”
”
pg 64





157 & 168 [GN]
Batman:
No Man's Land
by. DC Comics

After an earthquake rips Gotham City apart, the government declares the city a No Man's Land. They destroy all bridges leading to it and forbid anyone from entering or leaving. In order to survive, various factions (most lead by former super heroes or villains) compete for supplies and territory.


I've known the story of the No Man's Land story arc for many years, but I've never actually read it. I finally decided to give it a go after the new Batman movie borrowed a lot of plot elements from it. And thus I borrowed the first two complete volumes from the library.

I have a lot of mixed feelings about the story arc, but it what it really comes down to is that these complete collections of No Man's Land are a pretty good example of what I hate about superhero comics. They so often have great ideas that are ruined by the cacophony of voices that exists across titles. You've got like 6 different comics all trying to tell stories with the same characters. Everyone's got a different take, everyone's got a different art style. If you had one team working together to tell this story I think it would have been amazing. But as it stands its just disjointed and hard to follow. I still read all the way through it, because the story, at its heart, is fascinating, but there is so much superfluous and contradictory material in these collections.

So yeah, a really, really amazing story idea, with some really, really amazing moments, that was terribly, terribly executed. I would recommend reading a synopsis of the events of No Man's Land instead of reading the actual comics. You'll hear about all the cool things that go down, but won't have to bog through all the muck to do so.





158.
The Rich and the Rest of Us:
A Poverty Manifesto
by. Cornell West & Travis Smiley

An honest look at poverty in America and what we can do about it.


“ 
There are nearly 150 million poor and near poor people in American who are not responsible for the damage done by the Great Recession. Yet they pay the price. The poor did not create the deindustrialization of America, unmatched corporate profiteering and greed, more than a decade of foreign wars, and unregulated tax benefits for the wealthy. When the largest economic institutions in the world were brought to their collective knees, they went crawling to the government's doorstep in search of salvation. The government obliged, allowing Wall Street to socialize its failure on the backs of the Main Street Americans. The housing and job crisis they created fostered a poverty unseen in generations—not just in inner-city ghettos and barrios, but also in suburbs and rural areas crossing racial, age, and gender lines. Nearly one-third of American middle class—mostly families with children—have fallen into poverty. 
”
pg back cover.


This book is pretty fascinating. They make some really interesting points. For instance they mention that the reason politicians are always talking about the Middle Class is because that's a safe thing to say. And yet the real problems aren't with the middle class but are with those in poverty. That by addressing real poverty we'd be able to make things better for everyone.

It also brought some really interesting ideas regarding poverty to light. Like how we've demonized this notion of poverty so much that no one wants to admit to being impoverished, because they think it says something about their character. But if no one admits to being impoverished then there won't be enough voices demanding help for those in poverty.

Like the title suggests, the book lays out a clear look and plan regarding poverty in America. It's a pretty short book and gives you a solid foundation of facts regarding the issues at hand and what can be done about them. I first heard about it when Travis Smiley and Cornell West appeared on The Colbert Report. So if you're the least bit interested I'd highly recommend you check that interview out.



“
Have you ever given thought to those curbside cut-ins on America's streets? Bikers use them, baby strollers and luggage-pushers use them. We use them at hotels, restaurants, airports, and more. Well, they weren't made for everyone. They were designed for the handicapped, but we all benefit. The same applies to the civil rights struggle—Black people benefited but so too did women, Latinos, Asians, and other minority groups.
We bring the curbside cut-ins and the Civil Rights Movement to make two points related to the current battle. First, when poverty ends, everybody wins—the economy of the nation as a whole, all classes, races, creeds, and neighborhoods. Second, to achieve this goal, it's necessary to change the outmoded 20th-century mind-sets, perceptions, and attitudes as we dare to bring the subject of poverty into the mainstream. 
”
pg 148





159.*
Equal Rites
by. Terry Pratchett

The seventh son of a seventh son is always a wizard. And so, an old wizard visits a seventh son family on the night of their seventh child's delivery and bestows it with his power before he dies. However, they all should have looked a little closer, because this seventh son of a seventh son is actually a daughter.


I haven't read any early Pratchett for quite some time, but I wanted to reread this one because the main character made a really interesting appearance in I Shall Wear Midnight.

I've been reading the newer Pratchett stuff for so long, I had kind of completely forgotten what his older stuff was like. This one is the 3rd book in the Discworld series so it is extremely early on and you can really tell. He hasn't quite figured out how to go at things, and the Discworld still hasn't solidified into the believable place it eventually becomes. There's some really odd bits where he makes references to things from reality (like cars and Gandalf), which he never-ever does in the later stuff. If he needs to make a reference to something from real-life he'll make a parodying reference to it through a Disc-filtered version, keeping things in context of the fantasy, instead of going outside of it.

So, I think I've lost my ability to judge this one from an outsider's perspective. It certainly isn't a bad book, it's still a lot of fun, but when you're used to Pratchett's later work this one just can't hold a candle.



“ 
“So,” said Granny, “how goes life?”

The other witch shrugged, causing the drummers to lose their grip again, just when they had nearly climbed back up.

“Like the hurried lover, it comes and goe--” she began, and stopped at Granny's meaningful glance at Esk.

“Not bad, not bad,” she amended.
”
pg 69





160* & 161. [GN]
Amulet
Book 1: The Stonekeeper
Book 2: The Stonekeeper's Curse
by. Kazu Kibuishi

After the death of her husband a woman moves her family to a new house. While exploring the house the woman is kidnapped by a monster and taken to a fantasical world. Now it's up to her two kids to save her. 


I generally really like Kazu Kibuishi's work, but I really don't like this series. I don't like it to the point that I forgot to take down any quotes and now I'm not going to bother going back to find one now. It is an outstandingly cliche Hero's Journey story. It's just so cliche. I was worried that I might overdose on cliche as I read it. The artwork was great, there's some fun imagery and fantasy elements, but in the end the story is just so formulaic that I just can't bring myself to care about any of the characters.




162. [CB]
Bad Kitty
by.

An alliterative alphabet book about a very naughty kitty.


I was taking care of my friend's cat while she was out of town and she left this book out for me to read in case her cat was acting out. I was surprised to find that its actually a pretty fun book. A lot of kids' books that do the whole alliterative alphabet thing usually just go through the list once. And that's because usually this type of book is for beginner readers. A is for Apple. That kind of thing. This one, however, uses more complex words and goes through the alphabet a number of times, each time using a different theme, and each time it fitting into the context of the story. It's a pretty darn fun book. It's definitely a unique little book and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.



“ 
Kitty was not happy.
Not happy at all.

That's when she decided
she would be a
BAD kitty.

...

She...

Ate my homework
Bit Grandma
Clawed the curtains
Damaged the dishes
Endangered the Goldfish
Flooded the Bathroom
Grappled with guests
Hurled hair balls at our heads
”

Monday, October 22, 2012

Countdown to the End


Back in September my aunt was laid off from the job she's had  for quite some time. For some reason or another during her last days there she sent me the following text:

"hey! request: I need count down numbers from 10 through 1 for my last 2 weeks of work. starting Monday. Would you do this for me? quirky, fun, illustrations, whimsical, silly or whatever...a mixture of all and anything"

I've been pretty busy working 3 jobs and I don't have a lot of free time, but seeing as how she was losing the job she's had for so long, I couldn't really say no.

After bouncing around some ideas I kind of landed on a rather odd line: "as Death said Ten." I played around with the idea a bit until it led me to the final concept: each number would have a little rhyme ending in Death counting down, and the illustration of the rhyme would depict the shape of the number. I wasn't really sure I should take such a morbid view, but I figured while the character of Death might be a bit depressing, at least true to the moment. Things were ending, changing, and nothing depicts change and endings quite like Death.

I'm really not sure why, but I somehow managed to take a rather basic task and making it so much more complicated by adding a writing element, a design element, and an illustrative element...sometimes I think I must really hate myself, because why else would I do these things to myself?

Regardless, here's the countdown:












































It was at this point that my aunt mentioned that they had let her leave a couple days early and thus what I was doing was no longer a countdown. And since it was no longer a countdown I immediately lost the fuel of urgency that had propelled me to make the rest. Before I might have wanted to read a book or watch a show, but I instead used my time to make these because they felt like they mattered. No to mention that there's nothing like a time limit to force you to push something out. But once I lost that aspect, then instead of completing them for my aunt, I would just be completing them for the novelty of a complete set. And, sadly, it probably says something about my character that I quit the project. But those are the breaks. I really don't have much free time these days and I generally need to use what time I do have to prevent myself from going crazy.

I am disappointed to leave it uncompleted, but without that original drive the ending notes just wouldn't be fitting.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Movie List 2012: August

* = rewatched


August


13.*
Hot Rod

A misfit stuntman tries to raise money for his dying stepfather.

Genre: Wonderfully Silly Comedy


Yeah, that's right, I watched this one again. One of my friends had never seen it and that seemed like something that needed to be rectified. I already talked about this one back when I watched it in January [ML2012 #13], but I can muster up some more.

I love this movie because I find it to be a perfect amount of silly. Unlike something like Zoolander which opens the flood gates of ridiculousness and never shuts off the valve, Hot Rod's silliness ebbs and flows. It moves between quirky and silly, hilarious and heart felt. And that just makes it all the funnier, because then you get laughs coming out of unexpected situations. I love the little quiet moments in the movie that come right before its best jokes.

What can I say? It's a little dumb, extremely silly, and it makes me laugh every time.




87.*
Hear No Evil, See No Evil

A blind man and a deaf man are suspects in a murder investigation. If they want to get out of this mess alive they're going to have to solve the case and clear their names by themselves.

Genre: 80's Buddy Comedy


If you were to tell me there was a new movie coming out about a blind man and a deaf man who try to solve a murder, I would tell you that that sounds like a terrible idea. And you know what? If this movie was made today, it would suck out loud. Yet this movie's from 1989 and guess what? It's brilliant.

First of all look at the main characters: Gene Wilder and Richard Pryor. If I had never seen this movie before I would watch it just to see what that team-up was like (hint: it's hilarious). Not only are they both amazing comedians in their own right, but I love that they're so different. They have very unique styles and yet they work well together. It makes their characters seem all the more like real people, unlike movies where the writer's style is omnipresent across all the characters' voices.

The weird thing is I first saw this movie as a kid and I enjoyed it just as much then as I do now. But when I was a kid I definitely didn't notice how raunchy it is, and by raunchy I mean they make a few jokes about sex and erections, and like so many 80's comedies there's a scene of some naked boobs as well. Yet none of it is gratuitous: it all makes a lot of sense within the context of the scene.  And that's one of the things I like about it. I mean adults make references to those things, they exist, it makes sense for such things to pop up from time to time.

It's funny, and it stars two infamous comedians, and with a premise like this you can't tell me you aren't a little bit curious.




88.*
Monty Python and the Holy Grail

The story of King Arthur, his Knights of the Round Table, and their divine quest to find the holy grail...in a manner of speaking.

Genre: Classic British Comedy


First of all, this movie is comedically brilliant. It's so insanely clever and the scenes in it are all so memorable.

But therein lies the problem. This was the first time I had seen this movie in many, many years and yet I think I could still reconstruct this movie for someone nearly scene for scene, nearly joke for joke. I probably have to blame this on the fact that when I was a kid people would not stop quoting this movie. I mean, yes, Monty Python is brilliant, but come on. There are other brilliant things out there. Let's quote something else for a while. And before you say it, Yes, I do realize that I'm being a total hypocrite because I'm always quoting The Simpsons.  But at least I quote The Simpsons and others. I swear there were some kids in high school who would quote this thing exclusively.

Now, why am I talking about this crap, instead of the movie? Because it's frickin' Monty Python and the Holy Grail! A frighteningly large number of kids found this movie to be so funny that they quoted it for years and years. I shouldn't have to say anything about classic movies, because you should have all seen them already. I mean, what's next? First you want me to tell you about Holy Grail, then next thing I know you'll be wanting me to tell you all about A Charlie Brown Christmas. I feel like an idiot sitting here and telling you these things. If you haven't seen this movie by now, I doubt I'm going to convince you to now.

It's a very funny movie, freakishly memorable, and I doubt I'll ever own it because I can remember the entire thing and thus generally have no reason to watch it.




89.*
Ernest Goes to Jail

Ernest P. Worrell is a lovable loser, but when he gets called for jury duty the crook on trial realizes that Ernest is the perfect double for the prison's most notorious inmate. The look-a-like manages to swap places with Ernest, and now he's got to find a way to get out of jail before that crook can hurt the people Ernest cares about.

Genre: Silly-Dumb Kids' Movie


Most of the things I said about Ernest Goes to Camp can be said about this one as well. Jim Varney is the sole reason to watch this movie. Pretty much all the other characters are annoying or bland...or annoying & bland. But Jim Varney makes me laugh. Even if he's doing some dumb slapstick bit that's obviously aiming at children, I still have to smile a little because he's so expressive while doing it.

I know I railed on Ernest Goes to Camp a little bit, but this one made me appreciate it more. Ernest Goes to Camp had a lot more characters for Ernest to bounce off of, a much bigger story, and a better backstory for Ernest. In Camp Ernest wants to be a camp counselor and that makes a lot of sense: He likes kids, he likes helping people, and he likes being trusted with important jobs. However, in Ernest Goes to Jail he dreams of being a banker...and I honestly can't figure out why. It really doesn't fit his character at all. Plus there are a number of bits in Goes to Jail that are just odd. It seems like a lot of stuff was shoved in willy-nilly. Lots of odd plot things too, like Ernest gets magnetized when he gets shocked with electricity? Why? Oh, because you needed to fill up some space with easy jokes, and you needed a deus ex machina in order to set-up the ending.

So, yeah, it definitely is far from the best. And yet, I did enjoy the movie. I just couldn't help myself. While most of it is pretty bland and dumb, there are a number of scenes that are just pure genius. I mean, there's a scene where Ernest is in the jury box listening to the case as he chews on a pen, and the pen breaks, and he's trying desperately to look nonchalant as he's got ink everywhere; it cracks me up so hard. The scenes like that one were just priceless, you guys. Priceless.




90.*
Back to the Future II

Doc Brown returns from the future to tell Marty that his future family is in danger. But when their time machine falls into the wrong hands, Marty and the Doc must travel all over time to set things right.

Genre: Time-travel Comedy Sequel


Back to the Future II is no Back to the Future. That's not to say that it isn't a fun movie, but it is to say that the original was a masterpiece and this one's...this one's a sequel. It definitely has that feeling of trying to cash in on the notoriety of the first one. Lot's of homages to past scenes and what not.

Anyways, it's still a really fun movie. And like the first one it's quite dark. When Marty and the Doc fracture the timeline, they end up creating a pretty dark world. It's kind of like a kid-friendly The Butterfly Effect in a way.

But I don't know. It's a really odd movie, and there really aren't any sequels like it. Part of it seems like a superfluous cash-in on a popular franchise, part of it cleverly weaves itself into an extension of the first movie, and part of it seems like an original dark-yet-kid-friendly story about time travel gone wrong.

I think what it comes down to is that if you liked Back to the Future, you'll probably enjoy this movie too. It won't impress you as much as the original did, but you'll get a kick out of it. If nothing else you'll enjoy references to the original as well as the 1980's view of the future which is hilariously off base. It's like the 80s on space steroids. I laughed out loud when they show that the house of the future is still using fax machines.




91.
Hope Springs

An old married couple go to couple's counseling in order to try to bring intimacy back into their marriage.

Genre: Senior Citizen Romantic Drama


I know this is a bit of a cop out, but I don't think I'm qualified in any way to rate this movie. I am so very clearly outside of its target audience. I'm not a senior citizen and I have extremely limited relationship experience, let alone marriage, let alone 30+ years of marriage. Considering those are the main themes of the movie I think its safe to say that I can't relate. So who am I to judge it when I have no idea how well it handled those themes?

I will, however, say that this movie is a lot less funny than the trailer depicted it as. I mean, sure it has its comedic moments, but overall this movie is a pretty heavy drama. It also discusses sexual topics much more than I was expecting. Both of which seem like things people should know about it. I mean, at the theater I work at we had a family come in who apparently didn't realize what kind of a movie it was and they brought their 10 year old along for. Surprisingly they actually made it 40 minutes into the movie before they walked out; and you can bet they had to field some rather interesting questions on the ride home.

The movie stars Tommy Lee Jones and Meryl Streep, and by "stars" I mean that they're practically the only actors in it. Sure there's a couple people here and there, and Steve Carell has some bits, but really Jones and Streep carry most of the movie by themselves. And as you'd expect they do a great job.

I will also say that although Streep's character is supposed to be the most sympathetic one, I personally found Jones' character to be the more sympathetic one. Streep's character did a lot whining, but it seemed that she was equally to blame and yet that fact was often glossed over.

So yeah, I don't know. I saw it because it was free and I was in the mood to see a movie. And it was kind of interesting and mostly enjoyable. So mission accomplished.




92.
Paranorman

Norman is a young boy who can talk to ghosts. This, however, makes him come off as crazy to rest of the world who can't. Yet, now the dead are rising from their graves and Norman is the only one who can save the town from its haunting past.

Genre: Claymated Supernatural Adventure


I wasn't sure what to expect from this one, but it contained a ton of elements that I like: zombies, the supernatural, claymation, jokes. Plus I had heard some really positive things about it and I was really curious to see what it was like. It far exceeded my expectations. Not only is the movie super cute, but the messages behind it are wonderful. It takes the plot in some directions I didn't see coming. The movie is kind of like what you'd get if you combined The Goonies, Doctor Who, and Hocus Pocus.

The only real complaint I have is that the art is both amazingly original and occasionally distracting. For instance I love the art style going on in the movie, and since claymation is so rare, it was a breath of fresh air seeing something done in clay, but not done in Burton or even Aardman's styles. And with that being said, the way a couple of the female characters have the most unnatural heads I have ever seen. I tried to look past it, but I couldn't. It is just bizarre. I can't even describe them properly. But if you watch the movie you'll see what I mean.

Similarly the animation was both amazing and slightly lazy. The action scenes were smooth, they took chances, they incorporated some really amazing effects, and they were just an absolute pleasure to watch. And yet a lot of the slower scenes seemed like they weren't being animating with as many frames and thus they seemed a little choppy. And choppy animation always slightly ruins the illusion of animation by reminding the viewer of the process. I don't really mind because I find the process fascinating, but I can see why it'd be a significant bother to some people.

I don't want to end this review on me complaining, so once again I'd like to say how much I love this movie. I saw it weeks ago and yet I've still got scenes from it replaying in my mind, and imagery bouncing around my imagination. It works on multiple levels and I think adults will enjoy it just as much as kids. If I get a chance I'd like to see it in theaters again, because some of those scenes looked so great on the big screen.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Timecard Typography: Jan-Sep 2012

You may recall that I try to write my name on my theater timecard in a different style every time we get new ones. However, this year I've been absolutely terrible at remembering to take pictures of them. It hasn't helped that with my other jobs I've had a lot less hours over there. But regardless of my excuses, I don't have picture of over half the ones from this year. I really need to start carrying my camera with me wherever I go.

I always hate to lose a timecard to the ether, but those are the breaks. What's really sad is that most of the ones I do have were taken on my phone, and my phone takes terrible pictures. And I just got a new phone recently and apparently it takes unusably terrible pictures (guess which photo it is!)

But without further ado, here they are.